Sei nella sezione: Punti di osservazione
LACK OF IMPACT AND SOURCES OF RESISTANCE
Estratto da
Dawes R.M., Faust D. & Meehl P.E. (1991). Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds., 2002) Heuristics and biases. The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. (pp. 716-729). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(pag. 727)
.....
Ultimately, then, clinicians must choose between their own observations or impressions and the scientific evidence on the relative efficacy of the clinical and actuarial methods. The factors that create difficulty in self-appraisal of judgmental accurancy are exactly those that scientific procedures, such as unbiased sampling, experimental manipulation of variables, and blind assessment of outcome, are designed to counter. Failure to accept a large and consistent body of scientific evidence over unvalidated personal observation may be described as a normal human failing or, in the case of professionals who identify themselves as scientific, plainly irrational.
.....
Menu di sezione: